City of London City Council · 2025-12-18

Transcript

London City Council December 18, 2025

2072 segments

Start a scrapbook.

>> She's not going to be here.

supposed to leave here and then they can

come.

>> That's mine.

>> They're just trying to make sure

>> I mean it's window.

>> So I don't know what that means. I would

ask

>> it.

>> So ours are probably all Windows 10 and

they'll have to they can buy that patch

for the MFA stuff.

>> Well, part of it. Yeah.

>> But but they're no longer being updated

for the year.

Windows 11.

>> There's a term for

>> service.

>> Service. That's one of the words. That's

not

>> the word.

>> Look at that. You've got that nice 1811.

You got that on. Eve's got hers on. Hers

looks a little different than yours.

>> We had a

presentation at 7:30 this morning.

And I was like, "Okay,

what can I get away with and where to

both places?

operational.

>> No, it's not the word.

>> Christmas party or something.

I don't know.

>> Is this a volume?

>> I guess push I think is you have to hold

that to

>> now.

>> I understand. It just seems like it's

picking up. It's really hot.

>> Really hot.

>> Really hot.

Terain

is no longer being supported. There we

go.

window.

>> We had some at least we did upgrade.

Tomorrow.

>> Yeah.

I would think

>> they're just checking

>> to make sure they're

>> the paper. It came through the I didn't

think they had

>> you check the email

Not by

>> should.

Got it.

>> But like

said,

Yeah,

>> I don't use it for

>> check my email.

I have one.

>> I guess I could take just

Yeah. When you turn that

Yeah.

Spirit Jesus.

Stop here.

Okay.

>> Yes.

>> Sorry. Okay.

>> Make sure you got

Good evening everyone. We'll call this

London City Council meeting to order.

Everyone will stand with me for the

pledge. In a moment of silent

reflection, Councilman McDaniels in

honor of your life

to the flag of the United States of

America to the stands nation

for all.

Thank you.

>> Mr. Clerk, will we take the roll call,

please?

>> Councilman Eids,

>> here. Councilman H

>> here.

>> Councilman Hayes,

>> present. Councilman Jackman

>> here.

>> Councilman McDaniels

>> here.

>> Councilman Saul

>> present.

>> Councilwoman Trainer

>> here.

>> Thank you.

I'd like to thank the clerk. If you

don't know, tonight will be his last

council meeting. Like to thank him for

his service.

I thought it was very professional and

uh the minutes I will I could always

follow along with those. I certainly

appreciate your efforts and I do want to

thank you. Uh moving on to the minutes.

Is there any additions or corrections to

the minutes tonight?

Hearing none. All in favor?

>> I and opposed.

Thank you.

We're not having any public hearings

tonight.

Communications and announcement. We do

have a an announcement. So, our next

meeting would be scheduled for January

the 1st. We're not going to meet on

January the 1st because this building

will be closed. We are going to move

that meeting to January 5th, Monday,

January 5th at our regular time. We'll

have our swearing in that day. Anybody

that needs to be sworn in, we'll have

the swearing in that day. Mr. Boyd, did

you pick up on that? Thank you.

Then we'll move on to our regular

schedule of first and third Thursdays of

the month after that. So once again,

January 1st meeting has been moved to

Monday, January 5th.

Audience concerns.

Mr. Kevin Crossley, if you'll step up to

the microphone, state your name and

address.

Kevin, 1044 way

sanitation. I know in past meetings

regarding recycling this and that it's

been put off that former safety director

service safety director was kind of

let's move forward from all that start

fresh

we need bodies

some equipment and this department will

run sufficiently

and make the city proud that's all I

have

thank

Mr. Raymond Anthony,

>> Raymond Anthony, 521.

On December the 10th, I sent an email to

the mayor and this is what I sent to

him. I go I tried to listen to the

December 4th, 2025 city council meeting.

However, I could not because there was

no sound. I went back to the November

20th, 2025 city council meeting and

there was sound but not loud enough to

hear what was being discussed.

Whose responsibility is it to make sure

the sound system is turned on before

every city council meeting and to make

sure there is enough volume so you can

watch and hear the city council meeting

as well. I attend most of the city

council meetings. I have brought this

issue up twice in the past year only to

fall on deaf ears. The city can

appropriate monies on just about

anything, but the city can't come up

with funds to upgrade our sound system

for our city council meeting. I'd like

to read the reply from the mayor. The

city council meetings are their meetings

ran by them and the video videoing is

their responsibility.

If they would like to appropriate money

to upgrade, we can get that done.

Sometimes the issue is that they lean

back and do not talk into the

microphone.

At the last meeting, when the clerk

showed up, he let us know that it was

recording, but not the sound. We tried

to troubleshoot it on the spot, but it

didn't work. Since then, we've had a

technician come in, and it seems to be

working. I hope this answers your

questions and a wonderful day.

My comment to city council going into

2026,

I would hope that the city council would

look into this issue to where this sound

system can be upgraded so that if you

can't attend a meeting, you can listen

to it at home on whatever device you

have so that you can get what is talked

about in that in those meetings. Thank

you.

>> Thank you.

Along those lines, Mr. Anthony, I'll

just make a quick comment. Um I think

even though properly noted that we're

not required to have video, we're not

required to have an audio recording.

We've kind of set the bar that this is

what we do and have been doing. And I

and I agree that I I'd like to see that

be done consistently. if we have to look

at an upgrade, then I think we should do

that. So, just wanted to let you know

that. Thank you.

Any other comments?

Is there anybody that didn't get a

chance to sign up would like to speak?

Thank you.

Moving on to committee reports.

Start with Mr. McDaniels.

Public service and public safety on the

non

EMS I'll start

there's a plan to discuss resident

versus non-resident rates for 2026 at

the next parks and recreation meeting on

Tuesday January 26 4:30

repairs done before opening day park

installed new Christmas lights on Main

Street this year

recreational basketball game started

this past Sunday December 7th

January spring volleyball registration

be starting at the end of February and

there's

the park at Park Avenue

and the fire and EMS

had a departmental EMS training

pediatric toxicology through Ohio health

uh departmental fire training new

part-timer orientation

hosted several students for ride time

Grant paramedic class provided EMS

coverage for football games

began to drive festivities and just they

did in a funeral procession for

Lieutenant White. That's all. I have I

have a question whether for you or maybe

the administration with the paving of

the basketball courts and we're going to

put pickle ball there. Have have lines

been laid out for that already?

Has it been painted?

>> So, I think the plan So, the the paving

occurred. The plan is in the spring.

They will come in. Um, I don't think

it's going to be line paving. They've

got a platform they put down to set

those up. Nothing is like that's

occurred yet. And it was waiting till

spring. One, they had to be ordered. The

other not to put it down until it could

be set in the spring.

>> Would be a sport court type thing.

>> Sport court. Yeah.

>> Okay. I forgot. Um, and I think that's

targeting around May. Somewhere around

there is when it's supposed to happen.

>> Okay. I had someone ask about that the

other day. Thank you,

>> Mr. Hayes. We had safety service meeting

on December the 9th. All three committee

members were present. We approved the

November meeting minutes. Uh, Chief

Nickel attended the meeting, gave his

report. Uh, Mr. Stall will give that

report momentarily. Chief Es from the

fire department gave his report and as

you heard Mr. Anthony or Mr. Brent just

gave that

um

safety service director uh advised us

that they are in the finalizing

uh the traffic control plan or the

traffic calming plan and under old

business we had none. New business we

had none. very short meeting. Uh we

adjourned at 608. Next meeting will be

on January the 13, 2026 at 6:00 pm in

the conference room next door. Thank

you.

>> Thank you.

I attended the personnel budget and

finance committee meeting. Just quick

update there. The uh expenses, pardon

me, the revenue for the year

lost the revenue for the year 22,428,235

and change. If we subtract the $4.2

million from the bond, that leaves us

with $18,228,751.

The expenses for the year are 19,57,961

and change. One of the questions that I

ask is what's why are we below that

number? Um, and it was explained the uh

the paving that all came up later. I

mean, it was paid for. It was

appropriated, but it was an expense. So,

that kind of hit all at once with the

the paving for the year. Um, there

didn't seem to be much concern at this

point about that. Overall,

uh, department head updates. I'm sure I

do have the tax report and I don't know

that I have it in front of me. If I do,

I do. And if I don't, I don't. But the

taxes were up. Do you have that? Oh, you

want to give that in a minute? I'll just

let you give that.

>> Go ahead.

>> The Let's see.

General fund

was up 5.98%

for the year.

Uh for the fire department, that was up

7.52% for the year. I don't know if you

want to.

>> No, that's that's fine. We know the tax

collections are up a little bit. I

appreciate that. Thank you. Um, under

new business, we uh,

if you don't know it, we consider

ourselves a trail town for bike riders.

The, um, there's Morpsy and

I think the state maybe are working on a

trail town designation throughout the

state. They're using us as one of the

first ones. Uh, the friends of Madison

County Parks and Trails asked for us to

make a small contribution to they'll

need for their startup, which is

initially $6,500. They're going to raise

some funds, but they asked if we could

contribute and I think we agreed

up to $3,500

out of our own funds. We don't need a

piece of legislation for that. Uh there

were some new policies that have been

brought forth by the

our hired HR person. They brought those

forth and we're going to see an item

tonight about

the new computers. The police department

is in need of computers to make those

compliant at the state level. So, there

will be a piece of legislation that

comes up for that. There's also going to

be another piece about a police cruiser

if we want to go ahead and get a police

cruiser

this year instead of waiting for next

year. They have a normal schedule.

Can I say something about that?

>> Pardon me.

>> Can I say something about that?

>> Sure.

>> The police cruiser would be better than

a 70 plus,000 SUV.

>> Well, it's that's the price that there

is. I'm not sure what it is. Tell the

truth, Brent. I just I just know that

they they said that there was one

available now. We wouldn't have to wait

six to eight months to get it. We'll

we'll discuss that when it comes up in

new business.

>> Sorry.

>> Our next meeting will also be on the

13th. We'll follow the other two

meetings. So, we'll officially say we'll

start at 6:30. If they run over, we'll

be a little late. If they finish early,

we'll start on time.

Okay, that's what I have. Grant or

sorry, Andy.

>> I attended the finance committee meeting

and the public service committee

meeting.

Greg covered the finance committee

meeting and we had a very short meeting

for public service. So there's nothing

additional on that other than we will

meet January 13th at 5 o'clock in the

meeting room next door.

Strainer.

>> Uh just to fill in the blanks a little

bit about the Morpsy and the Friends of

Madison County Parks and Trails

initiative uh to be recognized as a

trail town. Um a trail town is a new

designation that right now is going to

places like Columbus, Westville,

Worthington that designates

municipalities or cities as being um

bike or cyclist friendly. Um, so it's

kind of really thrilling that such a

small community as London is on the

scale of um those larger cities.

The um initial deposit of $6,500 was

being um there were matching funds that

uh were raised by Madison County Parks

and Trails. The Friends of Madison

County Parks and Trails Chamber of

Commerce also committed. I think they

also did some um fundraising efforts.

the initial the the contribution from

the city amounted to $3,500.

That money was already available within

the budget for 2025 from professional

services. So, um it's just a matter of

invoicing

um should uh council approve that. Um no

no further legislation was needed. That

initial $6,500 fee would be followed by

a $2,500 annual um membership fee that

the Friends of Madison County Parks and

Trails that they can handle through

their regular fundraising initiatives.

Um, and the initial funding and the

continuous funding would be really

towards making uh London a place on the

map when it comes to being a trail town,

including um making sure there's ample

bike racks um and that the tree boxes

which are now helpful for cyclists to

come in the town

would also include lots of wayinding and

signage and promotional um is really

geared towards the cycling community.

Um, so I think not only is it a $3,500

well spent, but since the city would not

there be any continuing cost for that,

this is just sort of an initial startup

fee. Um, but I believe the city does

stand to benefit pretty immensely from

being recognized as a as a trail.

Um, other matters that were discussed at

finance are going to come up here later

on the agenda.

Thank you, Mr. Stall.

>> I attended the public service and the uh

finance committee and I have a report

from the police department for the

safety committee. Building construction

is progressing with frame roof trusses

in the concrete port on the detention

side and the car carport areas. LPD

attended the funeral and provided

traffic control for MCSO detective

White's funeral procession with the big

assist from London Fire Central Fire

Departments along with OSP

officer Dylan Myers has resigned as an

officer to accept a position with MCSO

officers assisted with security and

traffic control for the downtown

oldfashioned Christmas event. We are

once again hiring officers. job posting

is online and they're accepting

applications until January 5th. Thank

you.

>> Okay. Is that all you have?

>> Okay,

Jackman.

>> Yes. I attended the public service

committee meeting and I have the street

department's report. Um, as was

mentioned by a few others, they were

busy helping with oldfashioned

Christmas, running the street sweeper,

putting up signage, and also getting

ready for the snow. Um

there's also quite a few entries on

Bill's notes that they were helping with

the trash department. Um repaired the

arm on the trash truck. They've done

some tree trimming, the no parking signs

for oldfashioned Christmas. Worked on

the trash trucks. Um had to talk to a

citizen about a tree

plowed snow. Worked with oldfashioned

Christmas.

Provided assistance to the trash

department. um street sweeper for

oldfashioned Christmas

yard waste for the trash department.

They had to push it up and pick it up.

Repair the locking bar on a rear load

trash truck. Um more brush pile

work with the trash department. Um and

also had to work on the trash

department's backhoe. So they as usual

were very busy and all over town helping

out.

Thank you.

Moving on, city officials reports.

>> Good evening. Thanks everyone for coming

out. I do want to start off by thanking

Matt for his service to city council as

clerk. Appreciate all he did for the

city. And as you guys spoke about, city

council will now be looking for a new

clerk. So if someone is interested, they

can apply online at london ohio.gov

under job opportunities tab. Also want

to thank Mr. McDaniels for his service

to London City Council as it's his last

meeting today for now, right?

>> Early Christmas present.

>> Um, but we spoke about this, but the

London Police Department building

construction is ongoing. They're

continuing to work hard, but the weather

has not been kind to us, as you guys can

tell. Um, the snow and frigid days have

had a little bit of a slowdown. Um, but

they continue to make progress.

I do want to congratulate Madison County

on landing net world sports. It's a huge

investment in the county, bringing a lot

of jobs. And I've seen a lot of articles

and it says coming to London, which in

theory is true, but this property is

located on the corner of State Route 42

and 29. So, it's past the expressway. It

is a London address, but is not in the

city limits. So, I know there was some

confusion online when people started

posting those articles.

Um, but we are continuing to work with

one Columbus to get someone in the old

Honeywell building. Um, I've had they've

had some interest. We've had some

conversations. They've had some

walkthroughs in the buildings. Um, the

team will continue to work to hopefully

get that building filled soon. And one

Columbus does feel like they have a

couple real good leads. So I have set up

a time to meet with them in January to

continue the efforts to get that

occupied.

Uh Business View magazine has done

another article on London and they'll be

launching that article after the

holidays. Uh the article is named

Growing with Purpose which talks about

balancing growth also the infrastructure

and keeping that small town charm. I'm

excited to have the article be released

to highlight all the great things going

on in London and the teamwork that's

taken place to make that happen. I was

able to teach to Junior Achievement to

Miss Dunham's class at London Elementary

and I took a day and went and spoke with

Miss McCormack's seventh grade class

about career readiness. Going into the

middle school was a great experience

where I got to talk about my job,

different city jobs, and just employment

as a whole. Uh the young adults were

fantastic and they had a lot of great

questions.

And as I spoke about, you know, it's

always a key responsibility of the mayor

to do that community outreach and just

showing up and listening and staying

engaged with residents at every stage of

life. So opportunities like visiting

schools and helping teach students

matter because they help build trust and

spark curiosity and remind us that young

people at their local leaders are

invested in them and in their future.

Been able to attend some events around

town this month. Madison Hills heartfelt

holidays. Um, Madison County Board of DD

had their office decorate decoration

tour. Uh, the Rotary Club's Santa

breakfast. And then Buckeye Community

School had a pancake breakfast. And I

even got to show off the pipes and sing

at the board of DD's Christmas cabaret

with the Manning Sisters, which is

always a wonderful time and really seems

to get people into the holiday spirit.

I was also able to be part of London

Police Department's Shop with a Cop.

It was a great event that helped out so

many families and kids. Right now, it's

tough for some families around the

holidays and events like this and the

fire department's toys for tots and I

don't know if you saw but even a local

business, Reinhardt Speed Towing had a

toy giveaway for families in need and

that was amazing. So, I want to thank

them and all who gave to make Christmas

a little special for those families

around town that really need it.

Fun fact is the number seven.

It's only seven days until Christmas, if

you can believe that. So, I hope you

have all your shopping as well as

wrapping done. I want to wish everyone a

merry Christmas and a happy new year.

And I look forward to what 2026 will

bring, continuing working hard for the

citizens. And just let you guys know,

I'll be looking to give the state of the

city address either in the second

meeting in January or one of the

meetings in February. So, everyone has a

wonderful and blessed Christmas. Thank

you.

>> Thank you, Mr. Saltz.

>> So, I I'll just have a couple things to

add. So, um one, last week I had an

opportunity to go to a uh ODOT

conference on roundabouts. Um learned

everything I ever wanted to know about

roundabouts. Uh cost designs, a lot of

new trends out there. It's actually a

great uh they had people literally from

all over the country, uh different

states that attend. Um but for me,

especially starting getting into uh some

of the zoning and things like that. It

was a good experience to see the number

of options out there and have a path

forward. So, uh today I attended the

Mass County Chiefs meeting uh for the

police and fire chiefs. Um there we

discussed that London will be hosting a

fullscale exercise u in the spring. So

last year they did a tabletop actually

they may call this a functional um but

they'll they did a tabletop exercise um

involving one of our um businesses and

uh with hazardous materials in that and

they're going to do it's either

functional or full scale in the spring.

So um good good to see us participating

in that. Uh only other thing and we

talked earlier about some of the

policies. Um so one we talked we've been

going to communicate with you guys about

computer issues. So uh hope to have the

cyber security and IT policy updated uh

to bring it to the next meeting to get

those updated in and also just working

on updating and uh getting job

descriptions current.

Okay, any questions for the

administration?

Okay, thank you. Moving on to old

business.

Resolution 1892. Motion to read by title

and number.

>> So moved. Second

>> resolution 18925, a resolution

authorizing the audit to open a bank

account for the tax department.

>> Oh, this is mine. Sorry. Um, it is

exactly what it sounds like it is. Um,

there was apparently some confusion

uh with deposits coming in from the tax

department that weren't um readily

reconcilable

uh because of the the joint um deposits

that were coming in from the city. So I

think this proposal would allow tax

deposits to come into the tax department

being reconciled within that department

and then moving over to the auditor's

department. So it would be time saving

which is a cost-saving measure. Um

unfortunately it's just one of those

things that has to come before council

for approval. It's pretty administerial

but that's where we are.

>> Any further discussion on that? There is

an emergency clause on this.

>> She would prefer to have it by the end

of the year so it starts fresh at the

start of the year.

>> That would make sense to me, right?

>> Yes.

>> I'll make a motion to suspend the three

reading rule.

>> I'll second.

>> Mr. Reeds,

>> yes.

>> Mr.

Yes.

>> Mr. Hit.

>> Yes.

>> Miss Jackman.

>> Yes.

>> Mr. McDaniels.

>> No.

>> Mr. Saw.

>> Yes.

>> Miss Trainer.

>> Yes.

>> Motion to adopt.

>> Second.

>> Miss Trainer?

>> Yes.

>> Mr. Reeds?

>> Yes.

>> Mr. Hayes?

>> Yes.

>> Mr. Hit?

>> Yes.

>> Miss Jackman?

>> Yes.

>> Mr. McDaniels?

>> Yes.

>> Mr. Stall?

>> Yes.

>> 18925 has been adopted.

Moving on. 190-25.

Motion to read the title number.

>> So move.

>> Second.

>> Resolution 19025. A resolution

authorizing the safety service director

to advertise for bids for sanitation

department services.

>> So this is just what it sounds like.

It's to make a determination whether

privatize sanitation services or not and

to allow the safety service director to

um put out bids for that if we would

choose to privatize.

Is there any additional information for

related to that?

>> Well,

yes. Um I'm going to add a little bit to

that. It's just a discussion point. Um

so it seems it seems like we would be

a little quick on this. If we just went

in right directly to that to advertise

for bids, um, which we can do, we can

get the bids, although we don't really

know what the public wants. We're going

to be making a determination whether or

not we know what the public wants. I

think it would be

beneficial to the public if we get this

on the ballot. and the ballot could say

something such as should the city of

London continue with sanitation

services. At that point, if the if the

public speaks and say they want it, then

we know which way to go. We know that we

have to fix it. We know we're going to

have to raise our rates. We know that

we're going to have to do that. If the

public says no, we don't want to dis

where we we don't want to continue the

service. Then we know which way to go

there and we're going to have to put

that out to bid. We can as a council

move forward and try to push this

through

without knowing that. You know, we could

do a poll, but polls aren't going to be

very scientific. The most scientific

poll we're ever going to have is at the

ballot box. And um I I just think that

uh I wanted to bring that up. I've had

that discussion with a couple other

people that, you know, they seem to

think it was a good idea. Uh at least it

would be fairly done at that point. Um,

so whether or not you want to move

forward, we can leave this on the second

reading tonight and we don't have to

make that determination tonight, but I

at least want to bring that up for

discussion for later. Mr. Saltzman,

>> I don't think your mic's working.

I think it is.

>> Nope. He's just a good projector.

>> You're ringing away.

We'll try that again, Mr. Salsman.

>> Okay, better.

>> Yes.

>> Yeah.

>> I mean, I could I could hear you before,

but you know, we want

>> I project hear

>> uh so earlier conversation uh about

that. There there's a few issues have to

happen to extend that into that time

period. One is the extension of the

contract with um Rumpkkey to continue

their services. Uh the contract does

allow that to continue. I The last

meeting we talked about extending it in

through March. We could extend it for

the entire for that year. I've got a

call into them. They did not reply back

after I reached out for them today, but

I I expect that to come back. It is in

the contract that way. Um and there

could be additional costs as we talked

last week. We know there's some

additional costs that are added to it um

to to extend it because of issues that

exist currently at the transfer station.

Um so I I will definitely continue to

look at that. Um, you want me to go over

everything since we're on tape or how do

you want to do that?

>> Well, I mean, if if we're there's four

different things that have to do with

this and they all kind of tie together.

So, you know, even though this is 19025

to advertise for bids to to shop this

out, we're you're now discussing 191

because we have to have our trash hauled

away in the meantime. So, I mean, I

think if you want to just continue on

with that conversation, then we'll kind

of have a better overall viewpoint.

Thank you. So um the the initial look

was to see is it uh feasible to uh

maintain our current services or or

increase them to bring it up to service

uh or to privatize to um to

the the current services meaning uh

sanitation and uh recycling. So looking

at the two uh there's there's pros and

cons both ways. One of the things we

determined is that there's no way we

continue the current services. Uh add

the people and the equipment we need for

the current rate that we were. So our

determination originally was 8 to10

additional a month to get that. With

that came some of the stuff Mr. Crosley

talked about equipment. Um, so, uh, we

do have a number of trucks, but but the

realism is we have one lease truck, uh,

that we have that's used and then two of

the, uh, 2019 trucks that were

previously purchased that can run but

alternate when they're down, uh, and

other equipment. So, the the

initial ask was that we buy get rid of

the lease, buy two trucks, and then we

need to buy probably a rear load for the

dumpsters that we have. three three

different trucks to purchase. One of the

problems we have with the current system

is the uh we use that as a transfer

station. Um these guys go out, they pick

it up, they bring it back, they dump it,

it goes into a compactor. Um that those

compactors need upgraded boxes. I think

that's a proper term. Needs updated. Um

and and that's part of the reason for

the increase. That's Rumpky's

responsibility, not ours, but they're

going to charge us for that. The other

issue is it currently runs that system

runs on a rotor system and and we just

don't have the ability to keep repairing

that system. We would likely have to

upgrade to a three-phase system. In

conversations with um uh Ohio Edison is

they would have to run either a line

from I believe center street or from 56

over to there and the anticipated cost

is somewhere between let's say 150 to

175,000. Um that would be to maintain

that electric system.

for the for the system. We also talked

about some of the other uh the other

cost building repairs that would be

whether we privatize or keep it

ourselves probably around 150,000. Those

those are going to have to be because

it's a city building. We continue to use

it one way or the other. So that um we

need to put money into it, but it it

really doesn't have a real impact on

that decision. Um the biggest change I

think recently we've seen is the hauling

fees as they increase each year of the

contract and I expect them to continue

to go up. We just can't tell you exactly

what they are. I I know they're going to

be $83.40 a ton um starting January 1st

through March. We just don't know after

that because of the the need for a

contract. Um the recycling we currently

pay $1,300 a month to to transfer that.

Um the best I can tell you other than

that's our only real like part cost we

have. Um but as we've talked over and

over, what we do have is wear and tear

on the trucks. Um and and with that

sometimes also great overtime. So that

should be fixed with uh hiring people.

Uh question come up last time, what's

our staffing? So full staffing is seven

people. That would be uh I believe five

drivers, the superintendent and the

>> yeah title was the foreman. Um so uh as

you heard your report earlier that that

street department send people over there

regularly. Uh they can't go without

help. They can't get the work done if

they don't have the people there.

>> How many How many staff is the

sanitation department short right now?

>> So currently you have

>> So you have three people short.

>> So we had one employee was hired well

two that recently hired one that didn't

make it through the week. It is we

currently have one advertised.

>> Okay.

>> For a job.

So equipment uh the staff uh the to the

trucks and the and the maintenance of

the trucks are an issue. We had a truck

go down early this week. I'm not sure if

that was from an accident or just wear

and tear.

So, and so there's just when there's

time delays like that, we just don't

have effective equipment. That's part of

the issue. Um

trying to think some of the other

questions were asked just make sure I

hit anything. So, um you know, we again

with the authorized drink, we have five

drivers. Um the format itself we would

need to get a new superintendent replace

that position. Um

and then again as I spoke the equipment

upgrading the electric

getting rid of the lease which is more

expensive in purchasing a truck would be

the most effective. I think we'd have to

look at it if we we're going to extend

it out to decide if we just extend that

lease first. Um and then a cost

increase. So no matter what, I don't

think we can move forward without a cost

increase in coverage. Whether it needs

to be that amount in the temporary, I

think the current setup is to raise 3%

at the first year uh to meet with the

auditor to see what that number would

look like to get us through May.

Probably I think with the numbers we

would probably be okay, but I

give me some time here look at some of

the notes from last week here.

>> Go while you look at your notes. So

Councilman, you talked putting it on the

ballot and I think that it was done a

long time ago too, right? Was it put on

the ballot a long time ago? Do you know?

I think at some point it was also um so

if you decide to do that,

um I'm the primary May next year. So

would you guys be looking to raise the

rates before May or wait until you get

to May to see what to do?

Well, it's a that's a good question

since Mr. Salsman just said with 3%

increase that was already going to come

in that was already built in.

>> Correct.

>> With with that increase then you know

they might be able to get through bay. I

mean this is just in the first

discussion point of what we could

possibly do to move forward. I think um

if we think about the primary or if not

right so there was and I discussed this

with Mr. results from the bid earlier

today and that is if you wait until the

November election, you don't have time

to bid this out if you want to, right?

So, I think we're kind of we're kind of

in a situation that if we're going to

put it on the ballot, we have to do it

in May if we can. Um,

if it if it if we're going to change,

then we've got a six-month runup if

we're to get the bids and to do all of

that because you could make this

effective January one of 2027,

right? That's just a thought process.

I'm just bringing this up. Um, and

raising raising the fees. I mean, that's

also on here tonight as the mayor

mentioned. Um, so that is 19225. I don't

know what the thought process is on

that. I don't think that we're going to

be able to do without it one way or the

other. I just don't know if we have to

do it now.

>> As as long as this has taken to get into

this kind of condition, I don't think

waiting till May is too long to wait.

>> Okay.

>> I mean, it's this has taken years to get

to this

situation.

>> What's the time frame as far as getting

it on a ballot in May? It has to be

>> It's 90 days.

>> So that'd be the first of first week of

February.

FB.

>> Yeah.

>> Yeah,

>> I believe. So I believe it's 90 days.

You said then we know what people want.

>> Well, that's probably the only way we're

going to know truly what the people

want.

>> I think this is transpire overnight.

This is taking right this situation,

>> right? I agree. Um, so I know you were

looking at your notes, Mr. Saltzman,

because we're kind of all over the board

here. Um, there were some additional

questions that were asked last time, I

since we didn't have a recording. Um, I

just want to address those again so we

can get those recorded.

Um, when the trucks were purchased four

years ago, was there an expectation to

keep the old rear loaders on the road at

that time? And did we get rid of any

older trucks at that time?

>> So that you're talking about the So I

think it was 2019. Is that correct?

2019.

>> Yeah, I guess that's the that's the

date. So that's longer than four years

ago.

>> Started in 2020.

>> Yeah.

>> Um I don't think they did get rid of

trucks that time, right? That was the

rear loaders. They went to those they

were kept. Um

that is we talked about that earlier. I

think we have two of those.

That correct? Two rear loaders that are

left that are there. Um one's a 2012 and

the other's a 2013. Is that correct?

>> That was like an 08.

>> Oh 08. Yeah. And then the only other

truck I think it's one when they went to

recycling was that the 13 the 2013 that

it's the green one. not used that much

um or not used at all is probably better

terminology. So

>> why it's not bigger

or

>> No, I I don't First of all, it's a lot

smaller. Correct. And that it's in

disrepair. It's not I don't know if the

word be rusted out.

Um that's a 2013. So

you in essence we have the the lease and

the two auto cars that are used

currently for trash pickup. If one's

down that creates creates an issue like

we we definitely need to get more

equipment as Kevin spoke people and and

the equipment what makes a difference.

Okay, next question. This was asked of

me today and I couldn't answer that and

that is if the rates are raised by$8

to$10 or whatever that number may end up

being. Um does this include keeping

recycling or is recycling going to be

removed and that cost would not include

recycling.

>> So that number did include what cost to

maintain and continue the recycling we

currently do.

>> Okay. Okay. Thank you. And then some of

the other things that we discussed at

the last meeting was, you know, do we

can can we determine these are this may

be lost income. You know, can we

determine how much a free yard of waste

cost the city? Um

how much it cost to have the yard waste

transported. There was a cost, I believe

you said that was about $6,500.

And that's just once per year, I believe

you guys said. Is that correct?

>> I think that was right. I think we

determined new costs are probably about

$8,500.

>> Okay.

>> Roughly.

>> So that's a cost that we take on because

we don't charge for that. That's just

built into our prices to have that done.

Um so that's that does cost a little bit

more. And then um I brought up the storm

water ordinance that current currently

it does not say that we can use that

money for billing, but half of the

billing that we pay for is for storm

water utilities. So, if we can take some

of that money out of the storm water

utility to help pay for the bills, that

would save sanitation some money because

they're taking the brunt of the cost. Is

that correct?

>> I I believe that's correct. And and to

justify that comment, if if we do

civilianize go away from um city

provided service, we're still going to

have to build for the storm water. So,

there's no reason I I in my opinion,

there's no reason that that that cost

can't be shared. Correct.

>> Right. So, We'll probably have to get

with the law director to see if we can

make a change to that ordinance so that

that could be

that that cost could be shared with the

storm water utility which we all pay and

it's got money in it. I mean I know that

the uh the point was to fix our storm

sewers but you know there's an

additional cost that they're taking on

because of that. Um any other questions

in general for Mr. Salsman right now

where we're having this bigger

discussion.

>> I also think that you guys need to legal

about how to get something like that

onto the ballot, if we're allowed to put

something like that on the ballot, if

it's a referendum by citizens, if it has

to be a referendum by citizens to be put

on the ballot. Um, because it's not

really like a tax issue. So, I think

there's some questions there on if it

can get on the ball ballot, how it has

to get onto the ballot. And then you can

also double check on the time frames

with that.

But, you know, also if we're talking

about May, these guys are are saying we

need more people, right? And we need a

department head. So, um we can run those

numbers and see if that 3% will hold us

afloat

because it'll only half a year, but

we'll probably definitely be over 50% of

the budget by June. If

if this goes to

>> do the other repairs that need done, can

those wait till May or those could be

put off until May if it was to go to the

ballot?

>> I think we can make some temporary like

the roofs could be temporary probably

fixed or the roof at least in the main

building. have to look for something

else deciding on the back can wait till

then. Um I mean it's something that's

going to have to be done eventually

anyway maintain the building but

>> I I wouldn't want to leave

we'd have to do something to fix it.

>> So the electric and the um additional

compactor wouldn't need to be done

unless we retain sanitation services. Is

that correct?

>> It is and that that's just um that's one

of the the chances we take if something

goes down in the meantime of coming up

with a plan B. Um that's probably a

complete wasted amount of money if we

don't maintain uh or if we're going to

maintain we're going to have to have it.

So, it's one of those calls we have to

look at and and the other issue is like

we could start now it may not happen. I

don't know what the and even we talked

to couldn't give us a schedule how long

that would take to get done. So, I think

we continue to look at it and then make

that decision move forward and then

continue to look to see if we can find

somebody else to do repairs on the road

system until

It's a dying trade. It's just not a lot

of people can do it. But we continue to

look to see. I mean, if it happened

tomorrow, we'd have to do the same

thing.

We love

So, if we put out bids for hauling is in

the annual contract. So, if we get a

contract with whoever wins the bid,

>> we're obligated for that time frame to

pay for that contract costs. The last

contract we did was a three-year

contract with escalating costs each

year. They they raise their their fees

each year. Um

you can do it. I mean you can set the

standard how you want like that. Um

I think the look here we would just

extend the current contract which it

states in the contract and be extended

addition years. So that's how I think we

take advantage of that extend that

contract to September would be the end

of the year. I think that's when the

first

two or something like that.

>> And and you mentioned the hauling fees

of 8340. That's an increase starting in

January.

>> I think it's 84

8340. I'm sorry. That will start

January. That will be the increase too.

That that went up about six or seven.

>> So part of the reason that's going up is

because they have

Yeah, the box

update and repair potentially update and

repair.

I I hope tomorrow I'll hear from from uh

Mr. Rupert and have a better idea on

what if we

help us a little bit to understand.

>> Mr. Saltzman, I believe we're leasing

one of the trucks now. And that lease is

up.

>> It'll be up, I think, in January or

February. I have to look. I think it's

January. It was a six-month lease. We

can extend that lease.

>> Okay.

>> Yeah, we can extend it.

>> I know.

>> It's definitely a lot more expensive. I

think the question come up last time

like what would it cost to just lease

instead of purchase? Well, you're paying

a lot more for that lease over the time

of the lease. I do agree if the short

term made sense. Let's let's lease it

while we're trying to look and determine

what our needs are. If we're going to

continue on, I think we're to make a

purpose not continue lease the lease in

short term probably the most prudent

thing

we make

>> what is our lease payment a month

>> 115

1100

new truck is $499,500

today they go up and down based on

that type of truck I think the rear load

289.

>> So if we since we're leasing, do the

does the lease company provide a truck

if that one was to break down or

>> they do or or repair whatever and

they're out of Cleveland? Actually, I

think we picked it up or got it

delivered the day after we signed the

paper.

>> We still pay for the repairs though.

>> Think I'm pretty sure I I didn't sign

that lease. I can't remember for sure.

And I didn't have

>> pretty sure we did.

>> Sure.

repairs

cheaper to own one if you maintain it.

>> Any other comments, questions?

>> So the only other thing I want to add I

did talk about last time was um staying

staying keeping our services maintain

them. We prevent this by having regular

cycles of replacing equipment waiting

six, seven years. You know those even

though they don't have a lot of miles

because of where it is, they still have

a lot of wear and tear. And in the case

of what we've been doing with them is

double duty literally as trucks are

down. They're running two cycles a day.

They're picking up trash and go back and

get recycle. So, you know, the the cost

is we just have to be prudent and make

sure we're planning part of what I

talked about from day one plan to have

new purpose equipment and have that

money set aside whether it be set aside.

So, we take our time and fix it right

one way or another. Don't jump into

anything.

>> Any any other further comments or

questions?

Mr. Mayor, you thought I thought pop in.

>> Yeah, I just the the

ballot thing I mean the ballot thing

happened last year, right? In my eyes,

you guys were elected to make these

decisions. Um, you're more than welcome

to to do this if you think that's what

needs to be done. Um, I think I would

hate for uh these gentlemen to be

sitting and trying to figure out what's

going on. Um,

in May and then, you know, the union's

probably going to have to run a

campaign. I mean, I don't know. It's And

so I think and I think either way, we

have to have some money to keep get this

thing going. We need to hire a

superintendent. We need to hire somebody

else. Hopefully two people. And we need

to figure out these trucks. So,

I would love to hear what you guys have

to say about the ballot or having these

guys make the decision.

>> Can I get a How long have we not had a

superintendent?

>> So, we had an acting superintendent. I

know we had one in house for a while and

then Bill was a acting superintendent

and then he stepped away from that

because we were trying to get this

figured out. So, going out and trying to

hire a superintendent and say, "Okay,

you know,

it's going to be on the ballot in May or

you know we may be privatizing here soon

is very difficult to hire a

superintendent to do that.

>> So we can go back and talk about that a

little bit too. Celeste did receive an

injury as you guys remember and you know

so we couldn't fill that position while

he was out and that was a very long time

that he was out and we thought he was

coming back then then he didn't think he

was coming back then he thought he was

coming back and it was a very long time

without um and there were some guys

stepping up in house trying to take care

of that and then you know with being

short-handed one at that point or two we

needed to bring somebody in and that's

when went over and was kind of doing

double duty because a lot of his guys

were going over there and helping. Um,

so that's kind of our thoughts on that.

>> And you were asking a question of who,

Mr. Mayor?

>> I I would just like to know. Would you

guys just

When did Bill step down as acting

superintendent?

I heard

I understand that that'll be that'll be

that that that would be an internal

discussion with us and I think we we did

that for a little while, right, Jason?

And then did you

I don't I don't remember how that went

down at the end, but we can have those

discussions. But um

>> that is an administrative function.

>> I got I know this comes back to the same

old thing, but how come we can't hire

anybody? They just they don't are they

are they that lazy? they want things

handed to them or just nobody want to

get their hands dirty.

>> I mean, we I think we pay good and I

think our insurance and stuff is good.

>> I I mean, we spoke about this before. I

think the pay is good and these guys

agreed with that and so

and so are the benefits, but I think,

you know, younger people don't get into

these professions. They don't think it's

a a cool job or whatever and they don't

look at the big picture about getting in

and getting into a city job and having

good benefits and good pay and and it

just makes it difficult. And you know,

nothing against anybody, but you guys

know the age of the people who

get the positions andor fill out the

applications, right? So,

is it a generational thing? I mean,

that's probably a bigger question,

right? But it's it's difficult.

Where do you guys post the job

applications other than the city

website?

So, aside from the city website and the

city socials, we publish them as far out

as Springfield. Um, so and they get

circulated heavily and I can pull the

numbers for you to um for the hits on

the job website and the socials.

>> I just know young people today aren't

going to nuance their searches to be

sight specific. They're going to go on

Indeed or they're going to go on

and then they're going to filter their

searches from there. But by going to a

blast a blast provider, we utilized

Indeed uh for I think not this last

round of sanitation hiring, but the one

prior to that

Indeed has unfortunately implemented one

click apply.

and you are inundated with anybody that

just needs to apply for a job, not

necessarily interested in the job or

qualified for the job.

>> If I may, if I'm not mistaken, as part

of the budget

for the auditor's office,

>> yeah, I think Kenn wanted to do the ADP

some sort of patch that would assist

with job applications. Is that right?

>> Right. And that that was approved in the

budget. So, she should have it was only

like $9,000.

>> I'm not sure that would be compliant

with whatever indeed's issue was sending

too many

>> the ADP recruiting if she wanted to. Uh

that was put in the budget an additional

$9,000. Maybe that helped out.

>> I'll I have a note here. I'll check on

that tomorrow. So, just to to comment

uh Shannon on yours. We're seeing the

same thing. So, um

NTN for police and fire. Um we're seeing

the same kind of thing. They talk to

Indeed, just everybody throws it in. So,

these are very specific to those jobs.

They actually take civil service tests.

That's how they take them. And we run

the same thing. We'll get 30 people and

then they find out it's in London or

it's not enough money. You know, out of

30 people, we'll have three that might

be viable. So, I I think it's a change

of culture. It's a change in age. Um,

probably a combination a lot. It's still

an issue has to be addressed. Not an

excuse. It's, you know, how do we get it

out there to that

>> working group?

>> Right. So, I was going to ask that,

right? Is the CDL the hangup?

I That's what I wonder. Is the CDL a

hangup? And I can't

>> and and I my thought process about that

I'm sorry to interrupt you Kevin the

thought process is we hire police

officers that aren't trained and we send

them to school right and if there's a

way to find a candidate that wants to do

the job they don't have a CDL that we

can work that out and pay for the CDL

then we have an employee and maybe maybe

there's a downfall to that that you pay

big money to have them get a CDL or if

if I'm and I'm not sure how the CDL

works because and I don't know this

question if if that works that you guys

can help somebody and they just have to

be with somebody and do so many hours

before they go take the test. Is that a

possibility? I just don't know how all

that works.

No, most people go to truck school for

just like a six week program or

something like that. But a lot of

drivers go to trucking school and get

it's like a six week program. Yeah.

>> Well, I just wonder if that's a

question, sir.

already.

>> You can't get your CDL until you're

>> 20 or 21.

>> 20.

>> Yeah. So, I mean, if you're talking like

the the tolls are not going to

candidates old enough.

>> Do they require a class B or an

>> A

>> that's that's a show for a license which

is Yeah.

>> comment with our sanitation department.

What do they require?

Well, that

>> so if you get a class B, you can get a

job there.

And maybe maybe that's the issue. I

don't know. But

there's some there's some challenges

>> but and quite honestly and this has been

addressed and I don't even I'm just

bringing it up because until this last

contract that they had a CDL they only

got paid 10 cents more an hour. Is that

right?

>> Was a dollar?

>> Nope. Nope. Nope. I think it was very

little before the last contract. It got

increased to like a$150.

>> Yeah. So 10 cents an hour that wouldn't

entice anybody for that.

>> And you would hire somebody with only a

class B. They don't have to have a class

A, right? What if they were unemployed

politician? Because I know here in a few

minutes.

>> Okay. Well, that's that's an awful lot

of discussion. Let's get back on track.

Uh so 19025

uh is has been read by title and number.

This is to advertise for bids for the

sanitation department. This is the

second reading of this, but at least

tonight hopefully all of the discussion

has been recorded. I know it's going to

be hard for everybody in the audience

without a microphone. That may not be

well heard, but you'll hear at least the

answers. So hopefully that helped out.

Um

unless we have Unless we have a reason

to move and uh to suspend or something,

I would think we would leave this on.

Maybe we can find out by the next

meeting a little bit more information if

we could even put it on the ballot if

that's a consideration or not. It may

not be. I don't know.

So,

>> I'm still looking.

>> Okay. So, we'll just we'll leave that

on.

Okay. 19125

a resolution. I I'll accept the motion

to read by title and number.

>> So moved.

>> Second.

>> Resolution 19125, a resolution

authorizing the safety service director

to advertise for bid for trash hauling

services.

>> Okay. I don't think we already did that.

So if we did, I apologize.

>> Uh this is just like it sounds for the

safety services director to take bids

for trash hauling. I assume that's

contingent upon what's determined in

1902.

Yeah, they've discuss in our agenda that

um the uh sanitation is se I'm sorry the

yes sanitation is split out from trash

hauling or something like that. It's two

separate

sanitation department services and trash

hauling services are two separate

resolutions.

>> When does that contract in? Was it

March?

at the

>> further.

>> I'm assuming we're leaving this on.

>> I would I would think.

>> Okay.

>> Uh 19225 motion read by title number.

>> So move.

>> Second.

>> Ordinance 19225, an ordinance adjusting

the rate of sanitation department

services.

So this is also contingent upon 1925. It

would be

uh to determine whether to raise the

rates for

sanitation services.

Truly it's 190 and 192 are the either or

right. So adjust our rates for what we

want to do to continue the service or

whether or not we're going to advertise

for bids. So one of those would

Regardless,

any further discussion

on third.

>> Okay, left on for third reading. Thank

you very much. 19325. Motion to read by

title number, please.

>> So moved.

>> Second.

>> Resolution 19325. A resolution adopt

Mass County multi-jurisdictional hazard

mitigation 5-year plan update.

>> I have a short statement I'll make on

this. Adoption of this plan is required

for Madison County to qualify for FEMA

hazard mitigation grants uh flood

mitigation assistance and hazard

mitigation grant programs without

adoption by all Madison County

municipalities.

Our county becomes ineligible for

federal grant dollars for floods, storms

such as tornadoes, uh extreme weather uh

that we may have, blizzards, ice storms.

Uh this plan ensures a countywide

coordinated approach to responding and

handling such emergencies.

Uh once this is adopted, Madison County

EMA will submit the plan and all support

resolutions of adoption to the state

emergency management agency for their

review, who then will in turn submit it

to the Federal Agency Management Agency,

FEMA, uh for county plan review and

approval letter. Uh this process we're

going through right now, this happens

every five years. Uh any county

jurisdiction that does not formally

adopt the plan will not

I'll say that again will not be eligible

for any potential federal mitigation

grant funding.

And we're not on a I think last council

meeting. We're not on an emergency with

this, are we? As long as it's done by

first the year, February. Okay.

>> Pass by February one. Is that what the

requirement is?

>> That that's when Yes. But it's 30 days.

There's not an emergency on it to enact

it, right? So if you guys pass it on

whatever you said, I can't remember what

day you said the next meeting is, it

wouldn't take effect for 30 days, which

would be February.

>> And the deadline was what? February 1st.

>> I'll make a motion to suspend a three

reading rule for this.

>> Second,

>> Mr. Stall.

>> Yes. Miss Trainer,

>> yes.

>> Miss Reeds,

>> yes.

>> Mr. Hayes,

>> yes.

>> Mr. Hit,

>> yes.

>> Miss Jackman,

>> yes.

>> Mr. McDaniels,

>> yes.

>> Motion to adopt.

>> Second.

>> Mr. McDaniels,

>> yes.

>> Mr. Stall,

>> yes.

>> Miss Trainer,

>> yes.

>> Mr. Reeds,

>> yes.

>> Mr. Hayes,

>> yes.

>> Mr. Hit,

>> yes.

>> Miss Jackman,

>> yes.

>> Thank you all.

>> All right. 19325 has been adopted.

>> Moving on to new business. 1942.

Motion to rebook by title number.

>> So moved.

>> Second.

>> Resolution 1942, a resolution increasing

appropriations.

>> So this came up at the finance meeting.

It wasn't actually

didn't sound like this was a true true

emergency. Here's what's happened. The

police chief, we've been on a schedule

to replace cruisers. I I

or SUVs. I don't know what it is, Brent,

but we we're on a schedule to replace

vehicles in the police department. This

vehicle seven and a half years old that

they would like to replace. They the

last time we ordered one, I think we had

six or eight months before we got it

because we had to order it. We had to

wait on it and they had to upit it and

outfit it and put radios and lights and

everything on it. They received the

chief received an email from the company

that they like to buy the cruisers from

that and say, "We have three on the lot

right now. If somebody wants these,

they're available right now. Um, we

confirm that there's money in the

capital improvement fund. If we want to

do this, this would be allowing us to go

ahead and make this appropriation and

purchase this vehicle now before the end

of the year because there's money there.

If we don't spend that money, it goes

back into the general fund to be

reappropriated later.

>> Is that correct, Mr. Saltzman? Did I get

that pretty much right?

that that is a complete cruiser too.

You're not buying the vehicle. You're

buying the vehicle outfitted and that

includes the transfer of the equipment

that needs to be done. So be when when

that that money will have everything

done. Not you're not buying an empty car

and later paying what we call upfitting

all the lights, sirens and all that that

is already done to it. That's

>> there was a small cost associated I

think with just like placarding or

putting on

>> Yeah. You'd have to put the marks of the

our sign

>> but everything was available in the

vehicle already.

>> Yeah, that's correct. That was that was

the benefit not waiting four months to

get a car and then wait three months to

schedule.

>> So, this was not in the original

package. We caught that. Clerk emailed

that. So, we have that in front of us

just in separate email does say this is

uh there's an emergency clause on that

if we'd like to do that. If not, then

the money that is there will end up

going back in. We might just have to

start the process over come next year.

further discussion.

>> Let me look and see if there was

anything else that the chief mentioned

here.

>> Okay.

>> Yeah. So, this is um Chief Kimman spoke

at finance. Um the money is currently in

the capital fund. Um there's a supplier

that had the cruiser already upfitted.

The uh cruiser that needs to be traded

in years old, 100,000 miles on it. Um

needs to be auctioned off. The um

capital fund has a million dollars

available, but only through the end of

the year. And we already talked about

the benefits of moving now, which just

gives the police department a cruiser on

the street instead of in the um shop,

you know, getting getting all those up

services.

emergency clause was concluded in the

finance committee bringing to council.

>> So I'll make a motion to suspend the

three reading rule.

>> Second.

>> Miss Jackman,

>> yes.

>> Mr. Daniels,

>> no.

>> Mr. Stall,

>> yes.

>> Miss Trainer,

>> yes.

>> Miss Reeds,

>> yes.

>> Mr. Hit,

>> yes.

>> Mr. Hayes,

>> yes.

>> Motion to adopt. Second.

Mr. Hip,

>> yes.

>> Miss Jackman,

>> yes.

>> Mr. McDaniels,

>> no.

>> Mr. Stall,

>> yes.

>> Miss Trainer,

>> yes.

>> Miss Mr. Reeds,

>> yes.

>> Mr. Hayes,

>> yes.

>> 1942 has been adopted. Moving on to

1952. Motion to read for title number,

please.

>> So moved.

>> And a second.

>> I'll second. Resolution 19525, a

resolution on transferring

appropriations.

>> So, this is uh $49,338

and no sense. That's for computers to

upgrade all the computers and all of the

police vehicles. And I believe that was

due to them needing to be upgraded to

Windows 11, which the current computers

aren't able to do.

if um I even if they could be upgraded

the state wasn't going to accept those

due the protocol the lead lead system

for the police uses that if I'm if I'm

correct

I'm sorry Mr.

No, that's fine. So, the initial thought

was that they could be upgraded to the

Windows 10 Pro extension. Um, the

sheriff's office and leads both notified

they leads and C just would not accept

that. They had to be Windows 11

compatible to to go with that system.

>> How many computers is it? I

>> think that

>> was it nine.

>> Nine.

>> Nine.

>> Think it was nine.

These are the the cruisers computers.

That's correct. These are the ones that

go on the computer. They they get the uh

communications from the sheriff's office

and the dispatcher, the runs, the GPS,

and all that.

So, there's a lot going into these.

The $49,338

that right now is in the administrative

support part-time position. If you

remember when we got rid of the

dispatchers. We uh allowed for

administrative

assistant or I don't remember the

correct term, a full-time and a

part-time. So, they've not hired the

part-time person. That $49,338

is sitting there in that budget. That

may not have all been there. There was a

couple other things, but they can they

can say this is coming from that line.

And once again, if we don't spend it,

then it goes back into the general fund

for next year.

>> So the money's there regardless. It's

already there.

>> It's right now. Sorry, I can clear up

that the the current

>> it's a cobbling of various sources, but

all of the various funds are located

under the personnel subcategory. Um, and

if the uh personnel subcategory

transfers a total of $49,338

to operations category, all within the

LPD's um overall budget, then they have

the money um in order to pay for these

without it

um

affecting their overall budget is fine,

>> right? We're not spending any more money

than what we

>> No, they just need to shift it from

personnel to operations from I think

three different sources that are being

underutilized at this time. There's an

emergency clause on this. Um, I think is

there a deadline put on the for the

upgrade for the um

>> I I think the quote was good through

December was good for that.

>> U wasn't sure if there was

um Yeah.

>> So the the Windows 10 expired in October

on October 17th this year. We have the

Windows 10 extension pro. So, we're

still getting security updates. The

sheriff is leniently giving us that

expansion. We have a plan, full plan. Uh

the issue would be if one of those

computers break down can't they won't be

>> but so the extension pro doesn't is that

the port that's no longer going to be

compatible with the leads upgrade or

that it's not compatible now.

>> They don't they don't accept it as a

security. So something would happen

then.

>> Got it. Got it. Okay.

Well, they got to have the computers.

>> Yes, they do.

>> I'll make a motion to suspend the three

reading rule.

>> Second,

>> Mr. Hayes.

>> Yes.

>> Mr. Hit.

>> Yes.

>> Miss Jackman,

>> yes.

>> Mr. McDaniels,

>> yes.

>> Mr. Stall,

>> yes.

>> Miss Trainer,

>> yes.

>> M Reeds,

>> yes.

>> Motion to adopt.

>> Second.

>> Mr. Reeds?

>> Yes.

>> Mr. Hayes?

>> Yes.

>> Mr. Hit?

>> Yes. Miss Jackman,

>> yes.

>> Mr. McDaniels,

>> yes.

>> Mr. Saul,

>> yes.

>> Miss Trainer,

>> yes.

>> 195-25

has been adopted.

All right, let's move on to round table.

Who wants to volunteer to go first

tonight?

>> I'll go. I'll go first.

>> You'll go.

>> Yeah.

>> Okay.

>> Got a long list here. U first of all, I

want to thank all of our city employees

for jobs well done, especially this past

weekend. I know it was hell out there. U

and thanks everybody for taking care of

the roads for us. Uh thank you for all

of our police officers, our firemen, our

EMTs, uh fire uh I don't want to be

misunderstood. Ladies also, um

firefighters, that's the word I'm

wanting. Um want to thank all of our

employees in this building. You do a

great job. Um,

we got Christmas coming up. So, I want

to wish everybody, and I'm going to say

it, a merry Christmas

uh, and a happy new year. Uh, remember

the reason for the season.

And, um,

thank you to Mr. McDaniel. Been a

pleasure working with you, my friend.

And been a pleasure having you on my uh,

committee. And uh I just wish you God's

speed in your journey ahead.

And um merry Christmas to all of you. I

love you all. Thank you. And that's all

I got.

>> Who wants to follow that?

>> Lisa,

>> I really don't have anything to add

other than merry Christmas to everyone.

Take some time, enjoy the season, and

make some great memories. I'd also like

to thank Matt for all of his hard work

um and the time that he's put in here as

being council clerk and also to Bren.

>> Amen to that.

>> John,

>> I'd like to thank the fire department

for the good news I had the other day

about rescuing the dog was on the ice

pond. It's nice to hear nice things and

always bad things on the TV. So, it's

nice. And I also want to wish everyone

and their families very merry Christmas

and a happy new year.

And my opinion on this trash thing,

people don't understand why we're doing

what we're doing. We have to explain

things to them better. They just want

things cheaper or less expensive, but

they would like to localize even though

it might be cheaper the other way. And I

I personally don't think going to the

ballot's going to going to go go that

way. Thank you,

Dannon.

It's hard this time of year to take some

time and

have peace of mind, peace of heart,

peace to your friends and family, but

try Merry Christmas.

Take some time.

>> Uh, merry Christmas and happy new year

to everyone. And I'd like to thank Matt

and Brent for their service to the city.

Um, the next service committee meeting

is January 13th at 5 o'clock in the

meeting room next door.

>> Thanks, sir. Daniels.

>> Thank you everybody for coming out

voters put me up here for this two two

year vacation

mayor's table over here for the abuse

and the bullying made me stronger if I

do indeed come back in two years

pleasure working with council

I would also like to thank our clerk

once again Mr.

Um, you know, we've all been up here.

It's not an easy job. Not easy to

explain to people. Hopefully, Mr. Boyd

will do a good job. And my last words

are, please be kind to each other.

Please be safe

with whatever weather we have. And merry

Christmas. Thank you.

This meeting is